Demographics details for Greenwood, SC vs Zumbro falls, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenwood, SC vs Zumbro falls, MN.
Data | Greenwood | Zumbro falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 22,454 | 155 |
Median Age | 32.7 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $38,884 | $84,750 |
Married Families | 21.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Greenwood vs Zumbro falls
- In Greenwood, the population is higher at 22,454, compared to 155 in Zumbro falls.
- The median age in Zumbro falls is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 32.7 years in Greenwood.
- Zumbro falls has a higher median income of $84,750, compared to $38,884 in Greenwood.
- In Zumbro falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 21.0% in Greenwood.
- Greenwood has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
- The unemployment rate in Greenwood is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.5% in Zumbro falls.
Demographics
Demographics Greenwood vs Zumbro falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greenwood | Zumbro falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 48 | Data is updating |
White | 36 | 99 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenwood vs Zumbro falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenwood at 48% compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Zumbro falls at 99% compared to 36% in Greenwood.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenwood at 1% compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greenwood at 10% compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Greenwood at 5% compared to 1% in Zumbro falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenwood and Zumbro falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greenwood | Zumbro falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 8.8% |
Depression | 21.1% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 20.8% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 21.7% |
Obesity | 42.7% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenwood vs Zumbro falls
- More residents in Greenwood report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 14.4% in Zumbro falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Zumbro falls at 23.3% versus 21.1% in Greenwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenwood at 20.8% compared to 17.2% in Zumbro falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Zumbro falls at 21.7% compared to 14.1% in Greenwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenwood at 42.7% compared to 36.5% in Zumbro falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greenwood at 11.0% compared to 5.0% in Zumbro falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greenwood | Zumbro falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (383) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.1% (4,053) | 17.4% (27) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (3,589) | 1.3% (2) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (2,882) | 21.9% (34) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenwood vs Zumbro falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Zumbro falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 17.4% in Zumbro falls.
- More residents in Greenwood have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 1.3% in Zumbro falls.
- In Zumbro falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 12.8% in Greenwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.