Demographics details for Greenwood, SC vs Sloatsburg, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenwood, SC vs Sloatsburg, NY.
| Data | Greenwood | Sloatsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,454 | 3,008 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $38,884 | $104,602 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Greenwood vs Sloatsburg
- In Greenwood, the population is higher at 22,454, compared to 3,008 in Sloatsburg.
- The median age in Sloatsburg is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 32.7 years in Greenwood.
- Sloatsburg has a higher median income of $104,602, compared to $38,884 in Greenwood.
- In Sloatsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 21.0% in Greenwood.
- Greenwood has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 2% in Sloatsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Greenwood is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Sloatsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Greenwood vs Sloatsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenwood | Sloatsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 48 | 6 |
| White | 36 | 63 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Greenwood vs Sloatsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenwood at 48% compared to 6% in Sloatsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sloatsburg at 63% compared to 36% in Greenwood.
- In Sloatsburg, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Greenwood.
- Sloatsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 10% in Greenwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sloatsburg at 9%, compared to 5% in Greenwood.
- In Sloatsburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Greenwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenwood | Sloatsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 18.6% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 23.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenwood vs Sloatsburg
- More residents in Greenwood report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 12.5% in Sloatsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greenwood at 21.1% compared to 18.6% in Sloatsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenwood at 20.8% compared to 12.0% in Sloatsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sloatsburg at 17.4% compared to 14.1% in Greenwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenwood at 42.7% compared to 23.9% in Sloatsburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sloatsburg at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Greenwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenwood | Sloatsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (383) | 0.4% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (4,053) | 17.4% (524) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (3,589) | 6.7% (202) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (2,882) | 30.3% (912) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenwood vs Sloatsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Sloatsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 17.4% in Sloatsburg.
- More residents in Greenwood have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 6.7% in Sloatsburg.
- In Sloatsburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 12.8% in Greenwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.