Demographics details for Greenwood, SC vs Mokelumne hill, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Greenwood, SC vs Mokelumne hill, CA.

Data Greenwood Mokelumne hill
Population 22,454 808
Median Age 32.7 years 61.8 years
Median Income $38,884 $81,483
Married Families 21.0% 65.0%
Poverty Level 17% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Greenwood vs Mokelumne hill

  • In Greenwood, the population is higher at 22,454, compared to 808 in Mokelumne hill.
  • The median age in Mokelumne hill is higher at 61.8 years, compared to 32.7 years in Greenwood.
  • Mokelumne hill has a higher median income of $81,483, compared to $38,884 in Greenwood.
  • In Mokelumne hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 21.0% in Greenwood.
  • Greenwood has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in Mokelumne hill.
  • The unemployment rate in Greenwood is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Mokelumne hill.

Demographics

Demographics Greenwood vs Mokelumne hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Greenwood Mokelumne hill
Black 48 15
White 36 48
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 10 24
Two or More Races 5 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Greenwood vs Mokelumne hill

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenwood at 48% compared to 15% in Mokelumne hill.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mokelumne hill at 48% compared to 36% in Greenwood.
  • The Asian population is larger in Greenwood at 1% compared to 0% in Mokelumne hill.
  • Mokelumne hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 10% in Greenwood.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mokelumne hill at 13%, compared to 5% in Greenwood.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenwood and Mokelumne hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Greenwood Mokelumne hill
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.8% 13.6%
Depression 21.1% 24.2%
Smoking 20.8% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 14.1% 16.7%
Obesity 42.7% 32.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Greenwood vs Mokelumne hill

  • In Mokelumne hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.0% in Greenwood.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mokelumne hill at 24.2% versus 21.1% in Greenwood.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Greenwood at 20.8% compared to 17.6% in Mokelumne hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mokelumne hill at 16.7% compared to 14.1% in Greenwood.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Greenwood at 42.7% compared to 32.4% in Mokelumne hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Greenwood at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Mokelumne hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Greenwood Mokelumne hill
No Schooling 1.7% (383) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 18.1% (4,053) 12.5% (101)
Less than High School 16.0% (3,589) 8.7% (70)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.8% (2,882) 20.2% (163)

Education Levels Comparison: Greenwood vs Mokelumne hill

  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Mokelumne hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 12.5% in Mokelumne hill.
  • More residents in Greenwood have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 8.7% in Mokelumne hill.
  • In Mokelumne hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 12.8% in Greenwood.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.