Demographics details for Greenwood, SC vs Dalhart, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenwood, SC vs Dalhart, TX.
| Data | Greenwood | Dalhart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,454 | 8,402 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $38,884 | $75,000 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Greenwood vs Dalhart
- In Greenwood, the population is higher at 22,454, compared to 8,402 in Dalhart.
- The median age in Dalhart is higher at 34.7 years, compared to 32.7 years in Greenwood.
- Dalhart has a higher median income of $75,000, compared to $38,884 in Greenwood.
- In Dalhart, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 21.0% in Greenwood.
- Greenwood has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 12% in Dalhart.
- The unemployment rate in Greenwood is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Dalhart.
Demographics
Demographics Greenwood vs Dalhart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenwood | Dalhart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 48 | Data is updating |
| White | 36 | 37 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Greenwood vs Dalhart
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenwood at 48% compared to 0% in Dalhart.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dalhart at 37% compared to 36% in Greenwood.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenwood at 1% compared to 0% in Dalhart.
- Dalhart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 10% in Greenwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dalhart at 15%, compared to 5% in Greenwood.
- In Dalhart, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Greenwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenwood | Dalhart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenwood vs Dalhart
- More residents in Greenwood report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.5% in Dalhart.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dalhart at 23.5% versus 21.1% in Greenwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenwood at 20.8% compared to 17.8% in Dalhart.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dalhart at 18.9% compared to 14.1% in Greenwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenwood at 42.7% compared to 36.1% in Dalhart.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Greenwood and Dalhart at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenwood | Dalhart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (383) | 4.1% (348) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (4,053) | 20.8% (1,750) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (3,589) | 19.2% (1,609) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (2,882) | 13.0% (1,095) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenwood vs Dalhart
- In Dalhart, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 1.7% in Greenwood.
- In Dalhart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 18.1% in Greenwood.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dalhart at 19.2%, compared to 16.0% in Greenwood.
- In Dalhart, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 12.8% in Greenwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.