Demographics details for Greenwood, SC vs Conneaut, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenwood, SC vs Conneaut, OH.
| Data | Greenwood | Conneaut |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,454 | 12,400 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $38,884 | $55,708 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Greenwood vs Conneaut
- In Greenwood, the population is higher at 22,454, compared to 12,400 in Conneaut.
- The median age in Conneaut is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 32.7 years in Greenwood.
- Conneaut has a higher median income of $55,708, compared to $38,884 in Greenwood.
- In Conneaut, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 21.0% in Greenwood.
- Greenwood has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in Conneaut.
- Conneaut has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.1% in Greenwood.
Demographics
Demographics Greenwood vs Conneaut provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenwood | Conneaut |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 48 | 7 |
| White | 36 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenwood vs Conneaut
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenwood at 48% compared to 7% in Conneaut.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Conneaut at 86% compared to 36% in Greenwood.
- Both Greenwood and Conneaut have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greenwood at 10% compared to 2% in Conneaut.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Greenwood at 5% compared to 4% in Conneaut.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenwood and Conneaut at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenwood | Conneaut |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 27.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 45.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenwood vs Conneaut
- More residents in Greenwood report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.4% in Conneaut.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Conneaut at 25.4% versus 21.1% in Greenwood.
- Conneaut has a higher smoking rate at 27.0% compared to 20.8% in Greenwood.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Conneaut at 18.4% compared to 14.1% in Greenwood.
- Conneaut has higher obesity rates at 45.5% compared to 42.7% in Greenwood.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Conneaut at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Greenwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenwood | Conneaut |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (383) | 0.4% (50) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (4,053) | 26.8% (3,319) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (3,589) | 17.4% (2,157) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (2,882) | 11.4% (1,411) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenwood vs Conneaut
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Conneaut.
- In Conneaut, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.8% compared to 18.1% in Greenwood.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Conneaut at 17.4%, compared to 16.0% in Greenwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 11.4% in Conneaut.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.