Demographics details for Greenwood, IN vs Middletown, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenwood, IN vs Middletown, CT.
Data | Greenwood | Middletown |
---|---|---|
Population | 65,406 | 48,729 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 37.5 years |
Median Income | $75,398 | $75,120 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Greenwood vs Middletown
- In Greenwood, the population is higher at 65,406, compared to 48,729 in Middletown.
- The median age in Middletown is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 36.2 years in Greenwood.
- Greenwood has a higher median income of $75,398 compared to $75,120 in Middletown.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greenwood at 40.0% compared to 34.0% in Middletown.
- The poverty level is higher in Middletown at 9%, compared to 7% in Greenwood.
- The unemployment rate in Greenwood is higher at 3.8%, compared to 2.9% in Middletown.
Demographics
Demographics Greenwood vs Middletown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greenwood | Middletown |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 15 |
White | 76 | 61 |
Asian | 7 | 5 |
Hispanic | 7 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenwood vs Middletown
- In Middletown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 4% in Greenwood.
- Greenwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 61% in Middletown.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenwood at 7% compared to 5% in Middletown.
- Middletown has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 7% in Greenwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Middletown at 8%, compared to 6% in Greenwood.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenwood and Middletown at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greenwood | Middletown |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.0% |
Depression | 27.4% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 14.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 33.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenwood vs Middletown
- More residents in Greenwood report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.8% in Middletown.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greenwood at 27.4% compared to 23.7% in Middletown.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenwood at 17.2% compared to 14.5% in Middletown.
- Binge drinking is more common in Greenwood at 16.9% compared to 16.7% in Middletown.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenwood at 40.0% compared to 33.2% in Middletown.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Middletown at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Greenwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greenwood | Middletown |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (1,000) | 0.5% (237) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (11,136) | 16.3% (7,958) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (6,995) | 6.1% (2,971) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (13,060) | 27.7% (13,510) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenwood vs Middletown
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Middletown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 16.3% in Middletown.
- More residents in Greenwood have less than a high school education at 10.7% compared to 6.1% in Middletown.
- In Middletown, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.7% compared to 20.0% in Greenwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.