Demographics details for Greenwood, IN vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenwood, IN vs Loves park, IL.
Data | Greenwood | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Population | 65,406 | 23,365 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $75,398 | $56,370 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Greenwood vs Loves park
- In Greenwood, the population is higher at 65,406, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- The median age in Loves park is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 36.2 years in Greenwood.
- Greenwood has a higher median income of $75,398 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greenwood at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- The poverty level is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 7% in Greenwood.
- The unemployment rate in Greenwood is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Greenwood vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greenwood | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 7 |
White | 76 | 71 |
Asian | 7 | 3 |
Hispanic | 7 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenwood vs Loves park
- In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 4% in Greenwood.
- Greenwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenwood at 7% compared to 3% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 7% in Greenwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 6% in Greenwood.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenwood and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greenwood | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.3% |
Depression | 27.4% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenwood vs Loves park
- More residents in Greenwood report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greenwood at 27.4% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenwood at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Greenwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenwood at 40.0% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Greenwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greenwood | Loves park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (1,000) | 0.4% (97) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (11,136) | 17.1% (3,994) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (6,995) | 9.7% (2,262) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (13,060) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenwood vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Greenwood.
- More residents in Greenwood have less than a high school education at 10.7% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.