Demographics details for Greenville, NC vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, NC vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Greenville | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 89,233 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 26.9 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $47,485 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Greenville vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 89,233 in Greenville.
- The median age in Tacoma is higher at 36.9 years, compared to 26.9 years in Greenville.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085, compared to $47,485 in Greenville.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 24.0% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.9% in Tacoma.
Demographics
Demographics Greenville vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenville | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 39 | 11 |
| White | 50 | 53 |
| Asian | 3 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Tacoma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 39% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tacoma at 53% compared to 50% in Greenville.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 3% in Greenville.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 4% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 4% in Greenville.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Greenville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenville | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Greenville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 21.9% in Greenville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 17.1% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 14.2% in Greenville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenville at 41.6% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Greenville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenville | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (512) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (9,215) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (4,082) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (18,672) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Greenville.
- In Tacoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 10.3% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 4.6% in Greenville.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 20.9% in Greenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.