Demographics details for Greenville, NC vs Stillwater, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, NC vs Stillwater, OK.
| Data | Greenville | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 89,233 | 49,160 |
| Median Age | 26.9 years | 23.4 years |
| Median Income | $47,485 | $39,998 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Greenville vs Stillwater
- In Greenville, the population is higher at 89,233, compared to 49,160 in Stillwater.
- Residents in Greenville have a higher median age of 26.9 years compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Greenville has a higher median income of $47,485 compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 24.0% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 16% in Stillwater.
- The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Greenville vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenville | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 39 | 5 |
| White | 50 | 72 |
| Asian | 3 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 39% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stillwater at 72% compared to 50% in Greenville.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 3% in Greenville.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 9%, compared to 4% in Greenville.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Greenville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenville | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.0% in Greenville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stillwater at 26.1% versus 21.9% in Greenville.
- Stillwater has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 17.1% in Greenville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Greenville at 14.2% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 41.6% in Greenville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Greenville and Stillwater at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenville | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (512) | 0.5% (239) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (9,215) | 6.5% (3,199) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (4,082) | 3.9% (1,910) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (18,672) | 22.5% (11,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a high school diploma at 10.3% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Greenville have less than a high school education at 4.6% compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 20.9% in Greenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.