Demographics details for Greenville, NC vs Haslett, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, NC vs Haslett, MI.

Data Greenville Haslett
Population 89,233 19,091
Median Age 26.9 years 41.0 years
Median Income $47,485 $72,380
Married Families 24.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 23% 7%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Greenville vs Haslett

  • In Greenville, the population is higher at 89,233, compared to 19,091 in Haslett.
  • The median age in Haslett is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 26.9 years in Greenville.
  • Haslett has a higher median income of $72,380, compared to $47,485 in Greenville.
  • In Haslett, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 24.0% in Greenville.
  • Greenville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 7% in Haslett.
  • The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Haslett.

Demographics

Demographics Greenville vs Haslett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Greenville Haslett
Black 39 3
White 50 76
Asian 3 8
Hispanic 4 5
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Haslett

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 39% compared to 3% in Haslett.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Haslett at 76% compared to 50% in Greenville.
  • In Haslett, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 3% in Greenville.
  • Haslett has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Greenville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Haslett at 8%, compared to 4% in Greenville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenville and Haslett at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Greenville Haslett
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 8.7%
Depression 21.9% 24.8%
Smoking 17.1% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 18.2%
Obesity 41.6% 32.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Haslett

  • More residents in Greenville report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.4% in Haslett.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Haslett at 24.8% versus 21.9% in Greenville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 17.1% compared to 11.8% in Haslett.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Haslett at 18.2% compared to 14.2% in Greenville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Greenville at 41.6% compared to 32.3% in Haslett.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Haslett at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Greenville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Greenville Haslett
No Schooling 0.6% (512) 0.1% (15)
High School Diploma 10.3% (9,215) 8.6% (1,648)
Less than High School 4.6% (4,082) 3.4% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.9% (18,672) 42.1% (8,036)

Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Haslett

  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Haslett.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a high school diploma at 10.3% compared to 8.6% in Haslett.
  • More residents in Greenville have less than a high school education at 4.6% compared to 3.4% in Haslett.
  • In Haslett, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 20.9% in Greenville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.