Demographics details for Greenville, NC vs Canton, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, NC vs Canton, GA.
| Data | Greenville | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 89,233 | 35,809 |
| Median Age | 26.9 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $47,485 | $75,414 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Greenville vs Canton
- In Greenville, the population is higher at 89,233, compared to 35,809 in Canton.
- The median age in Canton is higher at 34.6 years, compared to 26.9 years in Greenville.
- Canton has a higher median income of $75,414, compared to $47,485 in Greenville.
- In Canton, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 24.0% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 9% in Canton.
- The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Canton.
Demographics
Demographics Greenville vs Canton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenville | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 39 | 12 |
| White | 50 | 55 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Canton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 39% compared to 12% in Canton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Canton at 55% compared to 50% in Greenville.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenville at 3% compared to 1% in Canton.
- Canton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 4% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Canton at 8%, compared to 4% in Greenville.
- In Canton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Greenville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenville | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 33.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Canton
- More residents in Greenville report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Canton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greenville at 21.9% compared to 21.8% in Canton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 17.1% compared to 16.0% in Canton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Canton at 15.8% compared to 14.2% in Greenville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenville at 41.6% compared to 33.4% in Canton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greenville at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Canton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenville | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (512) | 3.5% (1,250) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (9,215) | 10.1% (3,609) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (4,082) | 18.0% (6,437) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (18,672) | 19.7% (7,056) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Canton
- In Canton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.6% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a high school diploma at 10.3% compared to 10.1% in Canton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Canton at 18.0%, compared to 4.6% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 19.7% in Canton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.