Demographics details for Greenville, MS vs Woods hole, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, MS vs Woods hole, MA.

Data Greenville Woods hole
Population 28,017 992
Median Age 38.7 years 65.8 years
Median Income $35,148 $72,031
Married Families 25.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 30% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Greenville vs Woods hole

  • In Greenville, the population is higher at 28,017, compared to 992 in Woods hole.
  • The median age in Woods hole is higher at 65.8 years, compared to 38.7 years in Greenville.
  • Woods hole has a higher median income of $72,031, compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
  • In Woods hole, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
  • Greenville has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 5% in Woods hole.
  • The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.5% in Woods hole.

Demographics

Demographics Greenville vs Woods hole provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Greenville Woods hole
Black 87 Data is updating
White 11 96
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races 1 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Woods hole

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 87% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Woods hole at 96% compared to 11% in Greenville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Greenville at 1% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Greenville and Woods hole at 0%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woods hole at 4%, compared to 1% in Greenville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenville and Woods hole at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Greenville Woods hole
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 13.8%
Physical Health Not Good 16.3% 7.3%
Depression 21.2% 21.5%
Smoking 26.7% 9.5%
Binge Drinking 10.6% 19.3%
Obesity 46.0% 26.0%
Disability Percentage 28.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Woods hole

  • More residents in Greenville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 13.8% in Woods hole.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Woods hole at 21.5% versus 21.2% in Greenville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 26.7% compared to 9.5% in Woods hole.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Woods hole at 19.3% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Greenville at 46.0% compared to 26.0% in Woods hole.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 12.0% in Woods hole.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Greenville Woods hole
No Schooling 1.8% (501) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 20.2% (5,661) 7.4% (73)
Less than High School 15.5% (4,352) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.5% (4,052) 67.2% (667)

Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Woods hole

  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenville have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 7.4% in Woods hole.
  • More residents in Greenville have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
  • In Woods hole, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 67.2% compared to 14.5% in Greenville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.