Demographics details for Greenville, MS vs New london, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, MS vs New london, CT.
| Data | Greenville | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,017 | 27,980 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $35,148 | $56,237 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Greenville vs New london
- In Greenville, the population is higher at 28,017, compared to 27,980 in New london.
- Residents in Greenville have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 35.5 years in New london.
- New london has a higher median income of $56,237, compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greenville at 25.0% compared to 24.0% in New london.
- Greenville has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 12% in New london.
- The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.6% in New london.
Demographics
Demographics Greenville vs New london provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenville | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 87 | 17 |
| White | 11 | 41 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs New london
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 87% compared to 17% in New london.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New london at 41% compared to 11% in Greenville.
- In New london, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Greenville.
- New london has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 0% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New london at 11%, compared to 1% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenville and New london at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenville | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 26.7% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.6% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 46.0% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs New london
- More residents in Greenville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.9% in New london.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New london at 23.3% versus 21.2% in Greenville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 26.7% compared to 19.5% in New london.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New london at 15.2% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenville at 46.0% compared to 37.1% in New london.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 14.0% in New london.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenville | New london |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (501) | 1.4% (399) |
| High School Diploma | 20.2% (5,661) | 16.0% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (4,352) | 13.7% (3,830) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (4,052) | 16.9% (4,738) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs New london
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.4% in New london.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 16.0% in New london.
- More residents in Greenville have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 13.7% in New london.
- In New london, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in Greenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.