Demographics details for Greenville, MS vs Lafayette, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, MS vs Lafayette, IN.

Data Greenville Lafayette
Population 28,017 71,402
Median Age 38.7 years 33.0 years
Median Income $35,148 $50,674
Married Families 25.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 30% 14%
Unemployment Rate 5.8 4.2

Population Comparison: Greenville vs Lafayette

  • The population in Lafayette is higher at 71,402, compared to 28,017 in Greenville.
  • Residents in Greenville have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 33.0 years in Lafayette.
  • Lafayette has a higher median income of $50,674, compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
  • In Lafayette, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
  • Greenville has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 14% in Lafayette.
  • The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.8%, compared to 4.2% in Lafayette.

Demographics

Demographics Greenville vs Lafayette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Greenville Lafayette
Black 87 9
White 11 72
Asian 1 2
Hispanic Data is updating 12
Two or More Races 1 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Lafayette

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 87% compared to 9% in Lafayette.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Lafayette at 72% compared to 11% in Greenville.
  • In Lafayette, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Greenville.
  • Lafayette has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Greenville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lafayette at 5%, compared to 1% in Greenville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenville and Lafayette at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Greenville Lafayette
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 16.3% 12.1%
Depression 21.2% 25.4%
Smoking 26.7% 18.9%
Binge Drinking 10.6% 17.0%
Obesity 46.0% 34.2%
Disability Percentage 28.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Lafayette

  • More residents in Greenville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.4% in Lafayette.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lafayette at 25.4% versus 21.2% in Greenville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 26.7% compared to 18.9% in Lafayette.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lafayette at 17.0% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Greenville at 46.0% compared to 34.2% in Lafayette.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 12.0% in Lafayette.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Greenville Lafayette
No Schooling 1.8% (501) 1.0% (735)
High School Diploma 20.2% (5,661) 18.6% (13,253)
Less than High School 15.5% (4,352) 12.4% (8,844)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.5% (4,052) 17.9% (12,763)

Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Lafayette

  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenville have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.0% in Lafayette.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 18.6% in Lafayette.
  • More residents in Greenville have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 12.4% in Lafayette.
  • In Lafayette, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 14.5% in Greenville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.