Demographics details for Greenville, MS vs Harrisburg, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, MS vs Harrisburg, IL.
Data | Greenville | Harrisburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,017 | 7,982 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $35,148 | $38,937 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Greenville vs Harrisburg
- In Greenville, the population is higher at 28,017, compared to 7,982 in Harrisburg.
- Residents in Greenville have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 36.6 years in Harrisburg.
- Harrisburg has a higher median income of $38,937, compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- In Harrisburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 15% in Harrisburg.
- The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.2% in Harrisburg.
Demographics
Demographics Greenville vs Harrisburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greenville | Harrisburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 87 | 2 |
White | 11 | 90 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Harrisburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 87% compared to 2% in Harrisburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harrisburg at 90% compared to 11% in Greenville.
- Both Greenville and Harrisburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Harrisburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harrisburg at 6%, compared to 1% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenville and Harrisburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greenville | Harrisburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 14.1% |
Depression | 21.2% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 26.7% | 22.6% |
Binge Drinking | 10.6% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 46.0% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Harrisburg
- More residents in Greenville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 19.2% in Harrisburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harrisburg at 24.6% versus 21.2% in Greenville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 26.7% compared to 22.6% in Harrisburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harrisburg at 16.3% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenville at 46.0% compared to 40.5% in Harrisburg.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Greenville and Harrisburg at 28.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greenville | Harrisburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (501) | 1.8% (140) |
High School Diploma | 20.2% (5,661) | 14.4% (1,152) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (4,352) | 20.5% (1,638) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (4,052) | 14.6% (1,163) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Harrisburg
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Greenville and Harrisburg at 1.8%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 14.4% in Harrisburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harrisburg at 20.5%, compared to 15.5% in Greenville.
- In Harrisburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 14.5% in Greenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.