Demographics details for Greenville, MS vs Bendena, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, MS vs Bendena, KS.

Data Greenville Bendena
Population 28,017 131
Median Age 38.7 years 31.7 years
Median Income $35,148 $85,962
Married Families 25.0% 66.0%
Poverty Level 30% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.8 Data is updating

Population Comparison: Greenville vs Bendena

  • In Greenville, the population is higher at 28,017, compared to 131 in Bendena.
  • Residents in Greenville have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 31.7 years in Bendena.
  • Bendena has a higher median income of $85,962, compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
  • In Bendena, the percentage of married families is higher at 66.0%, compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
  • Greenville has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.8%, compared to 0.0% in Bendena.

Demographics

Demographics Greenville vs Bendena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Greenville Bendena
Black 87 Data is updating
White 11 100
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races 1 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Bendena

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 87% compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Bendena at 100% compared to 11% in Greenville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Greenville at 1% compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Greenville and Bendena at 0%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Greenville at 1% compared to 0% in Bendena.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenville and Bendena at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Greenville Bendena
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 16.1%
Physical Health Not Good 16.3% 9.5%
Depression 21.2% 22.5%
Smoking 26.7% 16.9%
Binge Drinking 10.6% 19.2%
Obesity 46.0% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 28.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Bendena

  • More residents in Greenville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.1% in Bendena.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bendena at 22.5% versus 21.2% in Greenville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 26.7% compared to 16.9% in Bendena.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bendena at 19.2% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Greenville at 46.0% compared to 37.1% in Bendena.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 8.0% in Bendena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Greenville Bendena
No Schooling 1.8% (501) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 20.2% (5,661) 32.8% (43)
Less than High School 15.5% (4,352) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.5% (4,052) 22.1% (29)

Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Bendena

  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenville have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Bendena.
  • In Bendena, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.8% compared to 20.2% in Greenville.
  • More residents in Greenville have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Bendena.
  • In Bendena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 14.5% in Greenville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.