Demographics details for Greenville, MS vs Bendena, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, MS vs Bendena, KS.
Data | Greenville | Bendena |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,017 | 131 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 31.7 years |
Median Income | $35,148 | $85,962 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 66.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Greenville vs Bendena
- In Greenville, the population is higher at 28,017, compared to 131 in Bendena.
- Residents in Greenville have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 31.7 years in Bendena.
- Bendena has a higher median income of $85,962, compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- In Bendena, the percentage of married families is higher at 66.0%, compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 0% in Bendena.
- The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.8%, compared to 0.0% in Bendena.
Demographics
Demographics Greenville vs Bendena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greenville | Bendena |
---|---|---|
Black | 87 | Data is updating |
White | 11 | 100 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Bendena
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 87% compared to 0% in Bendena.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bendena at 100% compared to 11% in Greenville.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenville at 1% compared to 0% in Bendena.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Greenville and Bendena at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Greenville at 1% compared to 0% in Bendena.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenville and Bendena at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greenville | Bendena |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 9.5% |
Depression | 21.2% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 26.7% | 16.9% |
Binge Drinking | 10.6% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 46.0% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Bendena
- More residents in Greenville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.1% in Bendena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bendena at 22.5% versus 21.2% in Greenville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 26.7% compared to 16.9% in Bendena.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bendena at 19.2% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenville at 46.0% compared to 37.1% in Bendena.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 8.0% in Bendena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greenville | Bendena |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (501) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 20.2% (5,661) | 32.8% (43) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (4,352) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (4,052) | 22.1% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Bendena
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Bendena.
- In Bendena, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.8% compared to 20.2% in Greenville.
- More residents in Greenville have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Bendena.
- In Bendena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 14.5% in Greenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.