Demographics details for Greenup, IL vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenup, IL vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Greenup | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,352 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $53,583 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Greenup vs Live oak
- The population in Live oak is higher at 7,034, compared to 1,352 in Greenup.
- The median age in Live oak is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 35.7 years in Greenup.
- Greenup has a higher median income of $53,583 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greenup at 47.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 9% in Greenup.
- Live oak has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.9% in Greenup.
Demographics
Demographics Greenup vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenup | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 38 |
| White | 99 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenup vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 0% in Greenup.
- Greenup has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- Both Greenup and Live oak have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Live oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Greenup.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Live oak at 12%, compared to 1% in Greenup.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenup and Live oak at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenup | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenup vs Live oak
- More residents in Greenup report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greenup at 23.5% compared to 19.3% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 19.2% in Greenup.
- Binge drinking is more common in Greenup at 17.7% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 37.1%.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greenup at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenup | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 29.0% (392) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 18.3% (248) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (149) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenup vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Greenup.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenup hold a high school diploma at 29.0% compared to 25.0% in Live oak.
- More residents in Greenup have less than a high school education at 18.3% compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenup hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.