Demographics details for Greensburg, PA vs Catawba, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greensburg, PA vs Catawba, SC.
Data | Greensburg | Catawba |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,715 | 1,439 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 32.7 years |
Median Income | $58,001 | $50,920 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Greensburg vs Catawba
- In Greensburg, the population is higher at 14,715, compared to 1,439 in Catawba.
- Residents in Greensburg have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 32.7 years in Catawba.
- Greensburg has a higher median income of $58,001 compared to $50,920 in Catawba.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greensburg at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Catawba.
- The poverty level is identical in both Greensburg and Catawba at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Greensburg is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Catawba.
Demographics
Demographics Greensburg vs Catawba provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greensburg | Catawba |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 23 |
White | 91 | 63 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 1 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greensburg vs Catawba
- In Catawba, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 3% in Greensburg.
- Greensburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 63% in Catawba.
- In Catawba, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Greensburg.
- Catawba has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Greensburg.
- Both Greensburg and Catawba have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greensburg and Catawba at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greensburg | Catawba |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 11.6% |
Depression | 22.9% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 18.4% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greensburg vs Catawba
- More residents in Greensburg report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.4% in Catawba.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greensburg at 22.9% compared to 22.2% in Catawba.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greensburg at 18.4% compared to 17.0% in Catawba.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Greensburg and Catawba at 18.3%.
- Catawba has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 34.2% in Greensburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greensburg at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Catawba.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greensburg | Catawba |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (16) | 0.1% (1) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (2,502) | 11.5% (166) |
Less than High School | 5.1% (745) | 15.7% (226) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.9% (3,965) | 21.5% (310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greensburg vs Catawba
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Greensburg and Catawba at 0.1%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greensburg hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 11.5% in Catawba.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Catawba at 15.7%, compared to 5.1% in Greensburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greensburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 21.5% in Catawba.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.