Demographics details for Greensboro, VT vs South san francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Greensboro, VT vs South san francisco, CA.

Data Greensboro South san francisco
Population 102 63,484
Median Age 67.0 years 42.3 years
Median Income $85,000 $127,062
Married Families 53.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.6

Population Comparison: Greensboro vs South san francisco

  • The population in South san francisco is higher at 63,484, compared to 102 in Greensboro.
  • Residents in Greensboro have a higher median age of 67.0 years compared to 42.3 years in South san francisco.
  • South san francisco has a higher median income of $127,062, compared to $85,000 in Greensboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Greensboro at 53.0% compared to 44.0% in South san francisco.
  • The poverty level is higher in South san francisco at 8%, compared to 6% in Greensboro.
  • South san francisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.1% in Greensboro.

Demographics

Demographics Greensboro vs South san francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Greensboro South san francisco
Black Data is updating 2
White 89 11
Asian Data is updating 45
Hispanic 5 30
Two or More Races 6 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Greensboro vs South san francisco

  • In South san francisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Greensboro.
  • Greensboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 11% in South san francisco.
  • In South san francisco, the Asian population stands at 45%, greater than 0% in Greensboro.
  • South san francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 5% in Greensboro.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South san francisco at 11%, compared to 6% in Greensboro.
  • In South san francisco, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Greensboro.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Greensboro South san francisco
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 12.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 8.8%
Depression 27.0% 13.7%
Smoking 16.2% 9.3%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 14.5%
Obesity 29.2% 21.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Greensboro vs South san francisco

  • More residents in Greensboro report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 12.9% in South san francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Greensboro at 27.0% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Greensboro at 16.2% compared to 9.3% in South san francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Greensboro at 18.3% compared to 14.5% in South san francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Greensboro at 29.2% compared to 21.9% in South san francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Greensboro at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in South san francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Greensboro South san francisco
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.5% (1,583)
High School Diploma 2.0% (2) 13.7% (8,667)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.8% (9,368)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 57.8% (59) 30.4% (19,273)

Education Levels Comparison: Greensboro vs South san francisco

  • In South san francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Greensboro.
  • In South san francisco, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 2.0% in Greensboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South san francisco at 14.8%, compared to 0.0% in Greensboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Greensboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 57.8% compared to 30.4% in South san francisco.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.