Demographics details for Greensboro, VT vs Forrest city, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Greensboro, VT vs Forrest city, AR.

Data Greensboro Forrest city
Population 102 12,676
Median Age 67.0 years 35.2 years
Median Income $85,000 $36,368
Married Families 53.0% 22.0%
Poverty Level 6% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 6.5

Population Comparison: Greensboro vs Forrest city

  • The population in Forrest city is higher at 12,676, compared to 102 in Greensboro.
  • Residents in Greensboro have a higher median age of 67.0 years compared to 35.2 years in Forrest city.
  • Greensboro has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $36,368 in Forrest city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Greensboro at 53.0% compared to 22.0% in Forrest city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Forrest city at 20%, compared to 6% in Greensboro.
  • Forrest city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.1% in Greensboro.

Demographics

Demographics Greensboro vs Forrest city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Greensboro Forrest city
Black Data is updating 73
White 89 16
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 5 6
Two or More Races 6 4
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Greensboro vs Forrest city

  • In Forrest city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 0% in Greensboro.
  • Greensboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 16% in Forrest city.
  • Both Greensboro and Forrest city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Forrest city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Greensboro.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Greensboro at 6% compared to 4% in Forrest city.
  • In Forrest city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Greensboro.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Greensboro Forrest city
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 19.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 16.5%
Depression 27.0% 21.2%
Smoking 16.2% 26.2%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 12.5%
Obesity 29.2% 49.7%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Greensboro vs Forrest city

  • In Forrest city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.2% in Greensboro.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Greensboro at 27.0% compared to 21.2% in Forrest city.
  • Forrest city has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 16.2% in Greensboro.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Greensboro at 18.3% compared to 12.5% in Forrest city.
  • Forrest city has higher obesity rates at 49.7% compared to 29.2% in Greensboro.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forrest city at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Greensboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Greensboro Forrest city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (105)
High School Diploma 2.0% (2) 21.3% (2,698)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.7% (2,241)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 57.8% (59) 8.9% (1,122)

Education Levels Comparison: Greensboro vs Forrest city

  • In Forrest city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Greensboro.
  • In Forrest city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.3% compared to 2.0% in Greensboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forrest city at 17.7%, compared to 0.0% in Greensboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Greensboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 57.8% compared to 8.9% in Forrest city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.