Demographics details for Greensboro, NC vs Talladega, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greensboro, NC vs Talladega, AL.
Data | Greensboro | Talladega |
---|---|---|
Population | 301,115 | 14,674 |
Median Age | 34.0 years | 39.6 years |
Median Income | $55,051 | $37,945 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Greensboro vs Talladega
- In Greensboro, the population is higher at 301,115, compared to 14,674 in Talladega.
- The median age in Talladega is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 34.0 years in Greensboro.
- Greensboro has a higher median income of $55,051 compared to $37,945 in Talladega.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greensboro at 29.0% compared to 28.0% in Talladega.
- The poverty level is higher in Talladega at 18%, compared to 14% in Greensboro.
- The unemployment rate in Greensboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Talladega.
Demographics
Demographics Greensboro vs Talladega provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greensboro | Talladega |
---|---|---|
Black | 42 | 55 |
White | 38 | 36 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greensboro vs Talladega
- In Talladega, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 42% in Greensboro.
- Greensboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 36% in Talladega.
- The Asian population is larger in Greensboro at 5% compared to 0% in Talladega.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greensboro at 9% compared to 6% in Talladega.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Greensboro at 6% compared to 3% in Talladega.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greensboro and Talladega at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greensboro | Talladega |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 21.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 15.9% |
Depression | 22.2% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 24.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 13.2% |
Obesity | 36.5% | 45.2% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greensboro vs Talladega
- In Talladega, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 15.8% in Greensboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Talladega at 22.7% versus 22.2% in Greensboro.
- Talladega has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 15.6% in Greensboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Greensboro at 15.5% compared to 13.2% in Talladega.
- Talladega has higher obesity rates at 45.2% compared to 36.5% in Greensboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Talladega at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Greensboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greensboro | Talladega |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (3,655) | 1.9% (273) |
High School Diploma | 11.5% (34,595) | 19.3% (2,827) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (26,682) | 26.2% (3,843) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.2% (75,909) | 9.4% (1,374) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greensboro vs Talladega
- In Talladega, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.2% in Greensboro.
- In Talladega, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 11.5% in Greensboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Talladega at 26.2%, compared to 8.9% in Greensboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greensboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 9.4% in Talladega.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.