Demographics details for Greensboro, NC vs Ladson, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greensboro, NC vs Ladson, SC.
Data | Greensboro | Ladson |
---|---|---|
Population | 301,115 | 15,298 |
Median Age | 34.0 years | 34.7 years |
Median Income | $55,051 | $74,020 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Greensboro vs Ladson
- In Greensboro, the population is higher at 301,115, compared to 15,298 in Ladson.
- The median age in Ladson is higher at 34.7 years, compared to 34.0 years in Greensboro.
- Ladson has a higher median income of $74,020, compared to $55,051 in Greensboro.
- In Ladson, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 29.0% in Greensboro.
- Greensboro has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Ladson.
- The unemployment rate in Greensboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Ladson.
Demographics
Demographics Greensboro vs Ladson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greensboro | Ladson |
---|---|---|
Black | 42 | 29 |
White | 38 | 49 |
Asian | 5 | 4 |
Hispanic | 9 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Greensboro vs Ladson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greensboro at 42% compared to 29% in Ladson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ladson at 49% compared to 38% in Greensboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Greensboro at 5% compared to 4% in Ladson.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Greensboro and Ladson at 9%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ladson at 8%, compared to 6% in Greensboro.
- In Ladson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Greensboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greensboro | Ladson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 11.5% |
Depression | 22.2% | 19.4% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 17.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 36.5% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greensboro vs Ladson
- In Ladson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.8% in Greensboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greensboro at 22.2% compared to 19.4% in Ladson.
- Ladson has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 15.6% in Greensboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ladson at 19.4% compared to 15.5% in Greensboro.
- Ladson has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 36.5% in Greensboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ladson at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Greensboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greensboro | Ladson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (3,655) | 0.7% (105) |
High School Diploma | 11.5% (34,595) | 14.0% (2,141) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (26,682) | 13.9% (2,130) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.2% (75,909) | 13.5% (2,065) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greensboro vs Ladson
- A higher percentage of residents in Greensboro have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Ladson.
- In Ladson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.0% compared to 11.5% in Greensboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ladson at 13.9%, compared to 8.9% in Greensboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greensboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 13.5% in Ladson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.