Demographics details for Greenbelt, MD vs Reedsport, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenbelt, MD vs Reedsport, OR.
Data | Greenbelt | Reedsport |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,360 | 4,320 |
Median Age | 37.2 years | 52.0 years |
Median Income | $82,019 | $48,329 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Greenbelt vs Reedsport
- In Greenbelt, the population is higher at 24,360, compared to 4,320 in Reedsport.
- The median age in Reedsport is higher at 52.0 years, compared to 37.2 years in Greenbelt.
- Greenbelt has a higher median income of $82,019 compared to $48,329 in Reedsport.
- In Reedsport, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 30.0% in Greenbelt.
- The poverty level is higher in Reedsport at 13%, compared to 9% in Greenbelt.
- The unemployment rate in Greenbelt is higher at 6.5%, compared to 5.0% in Reedsport.
Demographics
Demographics Greenbelt vs Reedsport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greenbelt | Reedsport |
---|---|---|
Black | 48 | Data is updating |
White | 17 | 92 |
Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 16 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Greenbelt vs Reedsport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenbelt at 48% compared to 0% in Reedsport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Reedsport at 92% compared to 17% in Greenbelt.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenbelt at 12% compared to 0% in Reedsport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greenbelt at 16% compared to 3% in Reedsport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Greenbelt at 6% compared to 3% in Reedsport.
- In Reedsport, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Greenbelt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greenbelt | Reedsport |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 19.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 12.7% |
Depression | 13.0% | 27.2% |
Smoking | 9.8% | 19.1% |
Binge Drinking | 12.3% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 36.0% | 34.6% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenbelt vs Reedsport
- In Reedsport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 12.9% in Greenbelt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Reedsport at 27.2% versus 13.0% in Greenbelt.
- Reedsport has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 9.8% in Greenbelt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Reedsport at 16.1% compared to 12.3% in Greenbelt.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenbelt at 36.0% compared to 34.6% in Reedsport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Reedsport at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Greenbelt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greenbelt | Reedsport |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (530) | 0.9% (40) |
High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,195) | 23.0% (995) |
Less than High School | 11.4% (2,766) | 18.4% (796) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.2% (7,832) | 7.8% (339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenbelt vs Reedsport
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenbelt have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.9% in Reedsport.
- In Reedsport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 9.0% in Greenbelt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Reedsport at 18.4%, compared to 11.4% in Greenbelt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenbelt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.2% compared to 7.8% in Reedsport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.