Demographics details for Greenbelt, MD vs Odessa, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Greenbelt, MD vs Odessa, MN.

Data Greenbelt Odessa
Population 24,360 104
Median Age 37.2 years 49.4 years
Median Income $82,019 $46,875
Married Families 30.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 6.5 2.3

Population Comparison: Greenbelt vs Odessa

  • In Greenbelt, the population is higher at 24,360, compared to 104 in Odessa.
  • The median age in Odessa is higher at 49.4 years, compared to 37.2 years in Greenbelt.
  • Greenbelt has a higher median income of $82,019 compared to $46,875 in Odessa.
  • In Odessa, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Greenbelt.
  • Greenbelt has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Odessa.
  • The unemployment rate in Greenbelt is higher at 6.5%, compared to 2.3% in Odessa.

Demographics

Demographics Greenbelt vs Odessa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Greenbelt Odessa
Black 48 Data is updating
White 17 88
Asian 12 12
Hispanic 16 Data is updating
Two or More Races 6 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Greenbelt vs Odessa

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenbelt at 48% compared to 0% in Odessa.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Odessa at 88% compared to 17% in Greenbelt.
  • Both Greenbelt and Odessa have the same percentage of Asian residents at 12%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Greenbelt at 16% compared to 0% in Odessa.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Greenbelt at 6% compared to 0% in Odessa.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Greenbelt at 1% compared to 0% in Odessa.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Greenbelt Odessa
Mental Health Not Good 12.9% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 9.1%
Depression 13.0% 22.5%
Smoking 9.8% 17.9%
Binge Drinking 12.3% 21.4%
Obesity 36.0% 36.8%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Greenbelt vs Odessa

  • In Odessa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 12.9% in Greenbelt.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Odessa at 22.5% versus 13.0% in Greenbelt.
  • Odessa has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 9.8% in Greenbelt.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Odessa at 21.4% compared to 12.3% in Greenbelt.
  • Odessa has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 36.0% in Greenbelt.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Odessa at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Greenbelt.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Greenbelt Odessa
No Schooling 2.2% (530) 1.9% (2)
High School Diploma 9.0% (2,195) 26.0% (27)
Less than High School 11.4% (2,766) 13.5% (14)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.2% (7,832) 26.0% (27)

Education Levels Comparison: Greenbelt vs Odessa

  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenbelt have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.9% in Odessa.
  • In Odessa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.0% compared to 9.0% in Greenbelt.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Odessa at 13.5%, compared to 11.4% in Greenbelt.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Greenbelt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.2% compared to 26.0% in Odessa.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.