Demographics details for Greenbelt, MD vs Crosbyton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenbelt, MD vs Crosbyton, TX.
| Data | Greenbelt | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,360 | 1,461 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $82,019 | $47,083 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Greenbelt vs Crosbyton
- In Greenbelt, the population is higher at 24,360, compared to 1,461 in Crosbyton.
- The median age in Crosbyton is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 37.2 years in Greenbelt.
- Greenbelt has a higher median income of $82,019 compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
- In Crosbyton, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 30.0% in Greenbelt.
- The poverty level is higher in Crosbyton at 22%, compared to 9% in Greenbelt.
- The unemployment rate in Greenbelt is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.2% in Crosbyton.
Demographics
Demographics Greenbelt vs Crosbyton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenbelt | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 48 | 3 |
| White | 17 | 6 |
| Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenbelt vs Crosbyton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenbelt at 48% compared to 3% in Crosbyton.
- Greenbelt has a higher percentage of White residents at 17% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenbelt at 12% compared to 0% in Crosbyton.
- Crosbyton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 16% in Greenbelt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crosbyton at 16%, compared to 6% in Greenbelt.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Greenbelt at 1% compared to 0% in Crosbyton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenbelt | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 13.0% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.3% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 36.0% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenbelt vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.9% in Greenbelt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crosbyton at 23.6% versus 13.0% in Greenbelt.
- Crosbyton has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 9.8% in Greenbelt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crosbyton at 15.4% compared to 12.3% in Greenbelt.
- Crosbyton has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 36.0% in Greenbelt.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 10.0% in Greenbelt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenbelt | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (530) | 2.1% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,195) | 24.6% (359) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (2,766) | 37.1% (542) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.2% (7,832) | 8.8% (129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenbelt vs Crosbyton
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenbelt have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 2.1% in Crosbyton.
- In Crosbyton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 9.0% in Greenbelt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crosbyton at 37.1%, compared to 11.4% in Greenbelt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenbelt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.2% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.