Demographics details for Greenbelt, MD vs Cave creek, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenbelt, MD vs Cave creek, AZ.
| Data | Greenbelt | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,360 | 5,135 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 58.1 years |
| Median Income | $82,019 | $90,824 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Greenbelt vs Cave creek
- In Greenbelt, the population is higher at 24,360, compared to 5,135 in Cave creek.
- The median age in Cave creek is higher at 58.1 years, compared to 37.2 years in Greenbelt.
- Cave creek has a higher median income of $90,824, compared to $82,019 in Greenbelt.
- In Cave creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 30.0% in Greenbelt.
- Greenbelt has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Cave creek.
- The unemployment rate in Greenbelt is higher at 6.5%, compared to 4.2% in Cave creek.
Demographics
Demographics Greenbelt vs Cave creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenbelt | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 48 | 2 |
| White | 17 | 88 |
| Asian | 12 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenbelt vs Cave creek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenbelt at 48% compared to 2% in Cave creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cave creek at 88% compared to 17% in Greenbelt.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenbelt at 12% compared to 1% in Cave creek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greenbelt at 16% compared to 5% in Cave creek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Greenbelt at 6% compared to 4% in Cave creek.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Greenbelt at 1% compared to 0% in Cave creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenbelt | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.9% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 13.0% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.3% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 36.0% | 27.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenbelt vs Cave creek
- In Cave creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 12.9% in Greenbelt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cave creek at 20.0% versus 13.0% in Greenbelt.
- Cave creek has a higher smoking rate at 11.3% compared to 9.8% in Greenbelt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cave creek at 19.5% compared to 12.3% in Greenbelt.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenbelt at 36.0% compared to 27.7% in Cave creek.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cave creek at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Greenbelt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenbelt | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (530) | 1.0% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (2,195) | 11.5% (590) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (2,766) | 4.2% (218) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.2% (7,832) | 40.9% (2,102) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenbelt vs Cave creek
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenbelt have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.0% in Cave creek.
- In Cave creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.5% compared to 9.0% in Greenbelt.
- More residents in Greenbelt have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 4.2% in Cave creek.
- In Cave creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 32.2% in Greenbelt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.