Demographics details for Green, OH vs Sandpoint, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Green, OH vs Sandpoint, ID.
| Data | Green | Sandpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,269 | 9,777 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $90,419 | $60,208 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Green vs Sandpoint
- In Green, the population is higher at 27,269, compared to 9,777 in Sandpoint.
- The median age in Sandpoint is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 41.1 years in Green.
- Green has a higher median income of $90,419 compared to $60,208 in Sandpoint.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Green at 45.0% compared to 35.0% in Sandpoint.
- The poverty level is higher in Sandpoint at 10%, compared to 4% in Green.
- The unemployment rate in Green is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Sandpoint.
Demographics
Demographics Green vs Sandpoint provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Green | Sandpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 85 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Green vs Sandpoint
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Green at 1% compared to 0% in Sandpoint.
- Green has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 85% in Sandpoint.
- Both Green and Sandpoint have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Sandpoint has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Green.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sandpoint at 7%, compared to 3% in Green.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Green and Sandpoint at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Green | Sandpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Green vs Sandpoint
- In Sandpoint, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.6% in Green.
- Depression is more prevalent in Green at 24.7% compared to 23.8% in Sandpoint.
- Sandpoint has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 17.4% in Green.
- Binge drinking is more common in Green at 19.1% compared to 16.4% in Sandpoint.
- Obesity rates are higher in Green at 40.2% compared to 32.5% in Sandpoint.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sandpoint at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Green.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Green | Sandpoint |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (46) | 2.5% (244) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (4,514) | 10.3% (1,005) |
| Less than High School | 3.0% (828) | 12.8% (1,249) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.3% (7,977) | 24.2% (2,370) |
Education Levels Comparison: Green vs Sandpoint
- In Sandpoint, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.2% in Green.
- A higher percentage of residents in Green hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 10.3% in Sandpoint.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sandpoint at 12.8%, compared to 3.0% in Green.
- A higher percentage of residents in Green hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.3% compared to 24.2% in Sandpoint.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.