Demographics details for Green bay, WI vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Green bay, WI vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Green bay Sterling heights
Population 106,095 132,567
Median Age 35.6 years 41.2 years
Median Income $59,174 $75,381
Married Families 34.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.7

Population Comparison: Green bay vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 106,095 in Green bay.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 35.6 years in Green bay.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $59,174 in Green bay.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 34.0% in Green bay.
  • Green bay has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.2% in Green bay.

Demographics

Demographics Green bay vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Green bay Sterling heights
Black 4 6
White 61 79
Asian 4 9
Hispanic 17 2
Two or More Races 11 4
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Green bay vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Green bay.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 61% in Green bay.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 4% in Green bay.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Green bay at 17% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Green bay at 11% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Green bay at 3% compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Green bay Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 11.4%
Depression 22.1% 25.5%
Smoking 16.8% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 22.8% 17.7%
Obesity 38.0% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Green bay vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.3% in Green bay.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 22.1% in Green bay.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 16.8% in Green bay.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Green bay at 22.8% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Green bay at 38.0% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Green bay at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Green bay Sterling heights
No Schooling 1.7% (1,796) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 18.1% (19,183) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 14.0% (14,805) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.6% (17,606) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Green bay vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.7% in Green bay.
  • In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 18.1% in Green bay.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 14.0% in Green bay.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 16.6% in Green bay.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.