Demographics details for Green bay, WI vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Green bay, WI vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Green bay | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 106,095 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,174 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Green bay vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 106,095 in Green bay.
- Residents in Green bay have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $59,174 in Green bay.
- In Fontana, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Green bay.
- The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 10% in Green bay.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Green bay.
Demographics
Demographics Green bay vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Green bay | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 8 |
| White | 61 | 2 |
| Asian | 4 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 14 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Green bay vs Fontana
- In Fontana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 4% in Green bay.
- Green bay has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 4% in Green bay.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 17% in Green bay.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 11% in Green bay.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Green bay at 3% compared to 1% in Fontana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Green bay | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.8% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Green bay vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.3% in Green bay.
- Depression is more prevalent in Green bay at 22.1% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Green bay at 16.8% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Green bay at 22.8% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Fontana has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 38.0% in Green bay.
- Disability percentages are higher in Green bay at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Green bay | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (1,796) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (19,183) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (14,805) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (17,606) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Green bay vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.7% in Green bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Green bay hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 14.0% in Green bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Green bay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.