Demographics details for Greeley, CO vs Meadville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greeley, CO vs Meadville, PA.
Data | Greeley | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Population | 109,209 | 12,680 |
Median Age | 31.9 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $65,525 | $46,157 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Greeley vs Meadville
- In Greeley, the population is higher at 109,209, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- The median age in Meadville is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 31.9 years in Greeley.
- Greeley has a higher median income of $65,525 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greeley at 36.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Greeley and Meadville at 12%.
- Meadville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.8% in Greeley.
Demographics
Demographics Greeley vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greeley | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 5 |
White | 45 | 86 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 39 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greeley vs Meadville
- In Meadville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Greeley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Meadville at 86% compared to 45% in Greeley.
- Both Greeley and Meadville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greeley at 39% compared to 2% in Meadville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Greeley at 11% compared to 6% in Meadville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Greeley at 1% compared to 0% in Meadville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greeley | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.0% |
Depression | 21.4% | 26.6% |
Smoking | 16.5% | 24.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 30.8% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greeley vs Meadville
- In Meadville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in Greeley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Meadville at 26.6% versus 21.4% in Greeley.
- Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 16.5% in Greeley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Greeley at 16.7% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 30.8% in Greeley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Greeley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greeley | Meadville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (2,416) | 0.2% (29) |
High School Diploma | 12.0% (13,106) | 24.5% (3,110) |
Less than High School | 19.3% (21,128) | 8.6% (1,085) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (17,877) | 15.4% (1,953) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greeley vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of residents in Greeley have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 12.0% in Greeley.
- More residents in Greeley have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greeley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.