Demographics details for Greeley, CO vs Lake leelanau, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greeley, CO vs Lake leelanau, MI.
Data | Greeley | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Population | 109,209 | 165 |
Median Age | 31.9 years | 27.9 years |
Median Income | $65,525 | $48,125 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Greeley vs Lake leelanau
- In Greeley, the population is higher at 109,209, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
- Residents in Greeley have a higher median age of 31.9 years compared to 27.9 years in Lake leelanau.
- Greeley has a higher median income of $65,525 compared to $48,125 in Lake leelanau.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greeley at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Lake leelanau.
- Greeley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Lake leelanau.
- The unemployment rate in Greeley is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.1% in Lake leelanau.
Demographics
Demographics Greeley vs Lake leelanau provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greeley | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 45 | 100 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 39 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greeley vs Lake leelanau
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greeley at 3% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake leelanau at 100% compared to 45% in Greeley.
- The Asian population is larger in Greeley at 1% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greeley at 39% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Greeley at 11% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Greeley at 1% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greeley | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 8.4% |
Depression | 21.4% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 16.5% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 30.8% | 31.7% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greeley vs Lake leelanau
- More residents in Greeley report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.4% in Lake leelanau.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lake leelanau at 22.5% versus 21.4% in Greeley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greeley at 16.5% compared to 12.5% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 16.7% in Greeley.
- Lake leelanau has higher obesity rates at 31.7% compared to 30.8% in Greeley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake leelanau at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Greeley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greeley | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (2,416) | 2.4% (4) |
High School Diploma | 12.0% (13,106) | 13.3% (22) |
Less than High School | 19.3% (21,128) | 4.8% (8) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (17,877) | 13.9% (23) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greeley vs Lake leelanau
- In Lake leelanau, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 2.2% in Greeley.
- In Lake leelanau, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 12.0% in Greeley.
- More residents in Greeley have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 4.8% in Lake leelanau.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greeley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 13.9% in Lake leelanau.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.