Demographics details for Greeley, CO vs Keiser, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greeley, CO vs Keiser, AR.
| Data | Greeley | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,209 | 713 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $65,525 | $50,136 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Greeley vs Keiser
- In Greeley, the population is higher at 109,209, compared to 713 in Keiser.
- The median age in Keiser is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 31.9 years in Greeley.
- Greeley has a higher median income of $65,525 compared to $50,136 in Keiser.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greeley at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Keiser.
- The poverty level is identical in both Greeley and Keiser at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Greeley is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Keiser.
Demographics
Demographics Greeley vs Keiser provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greeley | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 45 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 39 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greeley vs Keiser
- In Keiser, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Greeley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keiser at 83% compared to 45% in Greeley.
- The Asian population is larger in Greeley at 1% compared to 0% in Keiser.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greeley at 39% compared to 1% in Keiser.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keiser at 12%, compared to 11% in Greeley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Greeley at 1% compared to 0% in Keiser.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greeley | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 24.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 30.8% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greeley vs Keiser
- In Keiser, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.0% in Greeley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keiser at 28.9% versus 21.4% in Greeley.
- Keiser has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 16.5% in Greeley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Greeley at 16.7% compared to 15.2% in Keiser.
- Keiser has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 30.8% in Greeley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 11.0% in Greeley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greeley | Keiser |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (2,416) | 6.2% (44) |
| High School Diploma | 12.0% (13,106) | 15.0% (107) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (21,128) | 55.5% (396) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (17,877) | 7.3% (52) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greeley vs Keiser
- In Keiser, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 2.2% in Greeley.
- In Keiser, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Greeley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keiser at 55.5%, compared to 19.3% in Greeley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greeley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.