Demographics details for Greeley, CO vs Camp hill, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greeley, CO vs Camp hill, PA.
| Data | Greeley | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,209 | 8,204 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $65,525 | $104,959 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Greeley vs Camp hill
- In Greeley, the population is higher at 109,209, compared to 8,204 in Camp hill.
- The median age in Camp hill is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 31.9 years in Greeley.
- Camp hill has a higher median income of $104,959, compared to $65,525 in Greeley.
- In Camp hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 36.0% in Greeley.
- Greeley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Camp hill.
- The unemployment rate in Greeley is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.0% in Camp hill.
Demographics
Demographics Greeley vs Camp hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greeley | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 45 | 82 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 39 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greeley vs Camp hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greeley at 3% compared to 2% in Camp hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Camp hill at 82% compared to 45% in Greeley.
- In Camp hill, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Greeley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greeley at 39% compared to 5% in Camp hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Greeley at 11% compared to 5% in Camp hill.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Greeley at 1% compared to 0% in Camp hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greeley | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 30.8% | 28.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greeley vs Camp hill
- More residents in Greeley report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 13.8% in Camp hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greeley at 21.4% compared to 20.4% in Camp hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greeley at 16.5% compared to 12.8% in Camp hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Camp hill at 17.3% compared to 16.7% in Greeley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greeley at 30.8% compared to 28.8% in Camp hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greeley at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Camp hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greeley | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (2,416) | 0.6% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 12.0% (13,106) | 9.2% (756) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (21,128) | 4.6% (381) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (17,877) | 41.3% (3,388) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greeley vs Camp hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Greeley have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.6% in Camp hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greeley hold a high school diploma at 12.0% compared to 9.2% in Camp hill.
- More residents in Greeley have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 4.6% in Camp hill.
- In Camp hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.3% compared to 16.4% in Greeley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.