Demographics details for Graysville, AL vs Stoughton, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Graysville, AL vs Stoughton, MA.

Data Graysville Stoughton
Population 1,885 28,950
Median Age 44.3 years 40.0 years
Median Income $65,671 $86,000
Married Families 70.0% 54.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.7

Population Comparison: Graysville vs Stoughton

  • The population in Stoughton is higher at 28,950, compared to 1,885 in Graysville.
  • Residents in Graysville have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 40.0 years in Stoughton.
  • Stoughton has a higher median income of $86,000, compared to $65,671 in Graysville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Graysville at 70.0% compared to 54.0% in Stoughton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Stoughton at 5%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
  • Stoughton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Graysville.

Demographics

Demographics Graysville vs Stoughton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Graysville Stoughton
Black 43 7
White 55 72
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic Data is updating 12
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Graysville vs Stoughton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graysville at 43% compared to 7% in Stoughton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Stoughton at 72% compared to 55% in Graysville.
  • In Stoughton, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Graysville.
  • Stoughton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stoughton at 4%, compared to 2% in Graysville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graysville and Stoughton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Graysville Stoughton
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.0% Data is updating%
Depression 24.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 19.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.8% Data is updating%
Obesity 38.9% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 30.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Graysville vs Stoughton

  • More residents in Graysville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Graysville at 24.8% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Graysville at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Graysville at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Graysville at 38.9% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Graysville at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Graysville Stoughton
No Schooling 2.7% (50) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 30.4% (573) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 29.8% (561) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.8% (430) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Graysville vs Stoughton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Graysville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Graysville hold a high school diploma at 30.4% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
  • More residents in Graysville have less than a high school education at 29.8% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Graysville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.