Demographics details for Graysville, AL vs Goleta, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graysville, AL vs Goleta, CA.
| Data | Graysville | Goleta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,885 | 32,432 |
| Median Age | 44.3 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $65,671 | $113,889 |
| Married Families | 70.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Graysville vs Goleta
- The population in Goleta is higher at 32,432, compared to 1,885 in Graysville.
- Residents in Graysville have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 35.0 years in Goleta.
- Goleta has a higher median income of $113,889, compared to $65,671 in Graysville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Graysville at 70.0% compared to 37.0% in Goleta.
- The poverty level is higher in Goleta at 8%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
- The unemployment rate in Graysville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Goleta.
Demographics
Demographics Graysville vs Goleta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Graysville | Goleta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 43 | 3 |
| White | 55 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 11 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Graysville vs Goleta
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graysville at 43% compared to 3% in Goleta.
- Graysville has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 34% in Goleta.
- In Goleta, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Graysville.
- Goleta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Goleta at 14%, compared to 2% in Graysville.
- In Goleta, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Graysville | Goleta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 18.1% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 26.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graysville vs Goleta
- More residents in Graysville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 13.9% in Goleta.
- Depression is more prevalent in Graysville at 24.8% compared to 18.1% in Goleta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graysville at 19.6% compared to 9.8% in Goleta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Goleta at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Graysville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Graysville at 38.9% compared to 26.7% in Goleta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graysville at 30.0% compared to 8.0% in Goleta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Graysville | Goleta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (50) | 2.6% (836) |
| High School Diploma | 30.4% (573) | 7.0% (2,263) |
| Less than High School | 29.8% (561) | 15.7% (5,090) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.8% (430) | 32.6% (10,582) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graysville vs Goleta
- A higher percentage of residents in Graysville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 2.6% in Goleta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graysville hold a high school diploma at 30.4% compared to 7.0% in Goleta.
- More residents in Graysville have less than a high school education at 29.8% compared to 15.7% in Goleta.
- In Goleta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.6% compared to 22.8% in Graysville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.