Demographics details for Graysville, AL vs Farmington, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graysville, AL vs Farmington, WV.
Data | Graysville | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,885 | 397 |
Median Age | 44.3 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $65,671 | $54,750 |
Married Families | 70.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Graysville vs Farmington
- In Graysville, the population is higher at 1,885, compared to 397 in Farmington.
- Residents in Graysville have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 37.1 years in Farmington.
- Graysville has a higher median income of $65,671 compared to $54,750 in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Graysville at 70.0% compared to 44.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is higher in Farmington at 10%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
- Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Graysville.
Demographics
Demographics Graysville vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Graysville | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Black | 43 | Data is updating |
White | 55 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Graysville vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graysville at 43% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 100% compared to 55% in Graysville.
- Both Graysville and Farmington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Graysville and Farmington at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Graysville at 2% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graysville and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Graysville | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 20.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 14.8% |
Depression | 24.8% | 28.3% |
Smoking | 19.6% | 24.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graysville vs Farmington
- In Farmington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 19.4% in Graysville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 28.3% versus 24.8% in Graysville.
- Farmington has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 19.6% in Graysville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Graysville at 15.8% compared to 14.9% in Farmington.
- Farmington has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 38.9% in Graysville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graysville at 30.0% compared to 16.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Graysville | Farmington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (50) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 30.4% (573) | 31.5% (125) |
Less than High School | 29.8% (561) | 8.1% (32) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.8% (430) | 9.8% (39) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graysville vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Graysville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.5% compared to 30.4% in Graysville.
- More residents in Graysville have less than a high school education at 29.8% compared to 8.1% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graysville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 9.8% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.