Demographics details for Grayson, GA vs Pflugerville, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayson, GA vs Pflugerville, TX.
Data | Grayson | Pflugerville |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,753 | 65,556 |
Median Age | 31.2 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $121,421 | $111,151 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Grayson vs Pflugerville
- The population in Pflugerville is higher at 65,556, compared to 4,753 in Grayson.
- The median age in Pflugerville is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421 compared to $111,151 in Pflugerville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grayson at 47.0% compared to 43.0% in Pflugerville.
- The poverty level is higher in Pflugerville at 6%, compared to 5% in Grayson.
- Pflugerville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Grayson.
Demographics
Demographics Grayson vs Pflugerville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grayson | Pflugerville |
---|---|---|
Black | 74 | 17 |
White | 20 | 28 |
Asian | 1 | 8 |
Hispanic | 4 | 33 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grayson vs Pflugerville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grayson at 74% compared to 17% in Pflugerville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pflugerville at 28% compared to 20% in Grayson.
- In Pflugerville, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Grayson.
- Pflugerville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 4% in Grayson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pflugerville at 14%, compared to 1% in Grayson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grayson and Pflugerville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grayson | Pflugerville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 9.5% |
Depression | 17.5% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 11.3% | 11.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 19.9% |
Obesity | 28.5% | 28.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayson vs Pflugerville
- In Pflugerville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 13.3% in Grayson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pflugerville at 20.8% versus 17.5% in Grayson.
- Pflugerville has a higher smoking rate at 11.5% compared to 11.3% in Grayson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pflugerville at 19.9% compared to 15.6% in Grayson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grayson at 28.5% compared to 28.2% in Pflugerville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Grayson and Pflugerville at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grayson | Pflugerville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (519) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (703) | 12.1% (7,925) |
Less than High School | 6.4% (302) | 7.6% (4,951) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (1,172) | 27.3% (17,919) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayson vs Pflugerville
- In Pflugerville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Grayson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 12.1% in Pflugerville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pflugerville at 7.6%, compared to 6.4% in Grayson.
- In Pflugerville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 24.7% in Grayson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.