Demographics details for Grayson, GA vs Mc clure, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayson, GA vs Mc clure, OH.
| Data | Grayson | Mc clure |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,753 | 693 |
| Median Age | 31.2 years | 30.5 years |
| Median Income | $121,421 | $55,938 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Grayson vs Mc clure
- In Grayson, the population is higher at 4,753, compared to 693 in Mc clure.
- Residents in Grayson have a higher median age of 31.2 years compared to 30.5 years in Mc clure.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421 compared to $55,938 in Mc clure.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grayson at 47.0% compared to 37.0% in Mc clure.
- The poverty level is higher in Mc clure at 12%, compared to 5% in Grayson.
- Mc clure has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Grayson.
Demographics
Demographics Grayson vs Mc clure provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grayson | Mc clure |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 74 | Data is updating |
| White | 20 | 65 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grayson vs Mc clure
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grayson at 74% compared to 0% in Mc clure.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mc clure at 65% compared to 20% in Grayson.
- In Mc clure, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Grayson.
- Mc clure has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 4% in Grayson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mc clure at 15%, compared to 1% in Grayson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grayson and Mc clure at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grayson | Mc clure |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 19.9% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayson vs Mc clure
- In Mc clure, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 13.3% in Grayson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mc clure at 22.4% versus 17.5% in Grayson.
- Mc clure has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 11.3% in Grayson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mc clure at 19.9% compared to 15.6% in Grayson.
- Mc clure has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 28.5% in Grayson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mc clure at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Grayson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grayson | Mc clure |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (703) | 28.6% (198) |
| Less than High School | 6.4% (302) | 17.7% (123) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (1,172) | 5.5% (38) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayson vs Mc clure
- In Mc clure, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Grayson.
- In Mc clure, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.6% compared to 14.8% in Grayson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mc clure at 17.7%, compared to 6.4% in Grayson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 5.5% in Mc clure.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.