Demographics details for Grayson, GA vs Lathrup village, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayson, GA vs Lathrup village, MI.
Data | Grayson | Lathrup village |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,753 | 4,025 |
Median Age | 31.2 years | 48.2 years |
Median Income | $121,421 | $97,750 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Grayson vs Lathrup village
- In Grayson, the population is higher at 4,753, compared to 4,025 in Lathrup village.
- The median age in Lathrup village is higher at 48.2 years, compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421 compared to $97,750 in Lathrup village.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grayson at 47.0% compared to 40.0% in Lathrup village.
- Grayson has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Lathrup village.
- Lathrup village has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Grayson.
Demographics
Demographics Grayson vs Lathrup village provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grayson | Lathrup village |
---|---|---|
Black | 74 | 67 |
White | 20 | 27 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grayson vs Lathrup village
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grayson at 74% compared to 67% in Lathrup village.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lathrup village at 27% compared to 20% in Grayson.
- The Asian population is larger in Grayson at 1% compared to 0% in Lathrup village.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Grayson and Lathrup village at 4%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lathrup village at 2%, compared to 1% in Grayson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grayson and Lathrup village at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grayson | Lathrup village |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 9.0% |
Depression | 17.5% | 17.5% |
Smoking | 11.3% | 13.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 28.5% | 36.0% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayson vs Lathrup village
- In Lathrup village, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 13.3% in Grayson.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 17.5%.
- Lathrup village has a higher smoking rate at 13.0% compared to 11.3% in Grayson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lathrup village at 16.0% compared to 15.6% in Grayson.
- Lathrup village has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 28.5% in Grayson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lathrup village at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Grayson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grayson | Lathrup village |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (703) | 12.5% (502) |
Less than High School | 6.4% (302) | 4.5% (183) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (1,172) | 36.7% (1,479) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayson vs Lathrup village
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Grayson and Lathrup village at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 12.5% in Lathrup village.
- More residents in Grayson have less than a high school education at 6.4% compared to 4.5% in Lathrup village.
- In Lathrup village, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 24.7% in Grayson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.