Demographics details for Grayson, GA vs Harlingen, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayson, GA vs Harlingen, TX.
| Data | Grayson | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,753 | 71,678 |
| Median Age | 31.2 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $121,421 | $50,367 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Grayson vs Harlingen
- The population in Harlingen is higher at 71,678, compared to 4,753 in Grayson.
- The median age in Harlingen is higher at 33.2 years, compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421 compared to $50,367 in Harlingen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grayson at 47.0% compared to 32.0% in Harlingen.
- The poverty level is higher in Harlingen at 18%, compared to 5% in Grayson.
- Harlingen has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.5% in Grayson.
Demographics
Demographics Grayson vs Harlingen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grayson | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 74 | 2 |
| White | 20 | -5 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 83 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grayson vs Harlingen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grayson at 74% compared to 2% in Harlingen.
- Grayson has a higher percentage of White residents at 20% compared to -5% in Harlingen.
- Both Grayson and Harlingen have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Harlingen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 83%, compared to 4% in Grayson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harlingen at 19%, compared to 1% in Grayson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grayson and Harlingen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grayson | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayson vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 13.3% in Grayson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harlingen at 20.1% versus 17.5% in Grayson.
- Harlingen has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 11.3% in Grayson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harlingen at 16.3% compared to 15.6% in Grayson.
- Harlingen has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 28.5% in Grayson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harlingen at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Grayson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grayson | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.1% (1,536) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (703) | 13.6% (9,737) |
| Less than High School | 6.4% (302) | 26.2% (18,783) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (1,172) | 12.8% (9,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayson vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Grayson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 13.6% in Harlingen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harlingen at 26.2%, compared to 6.4% in Grayson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 12.8% in Harlingen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.