Demographics details for Grayson, GA vs Eureka, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayson, GA vs Eureka, MO.
| Data | Grayson | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,753 | 12,729 |
| Median Age | 31.2 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $121,421 | $104,697 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Grayson vs Eureka
- The population in Eureka is higher at 12,729, compared to 4,753 in Grayson.
- The median age in Eureka is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421 compared to $104,697 in Eureka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grayson at 47.0% compared to 42.0% in Eureka.
- The poverty level is identical in both Grayson and Eureka at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Grayson is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
Demographics
Demographics Grayson vs Eureka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grayson | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 74 | Data is updating |
| White | 20 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grayson vs Eureka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grayson at 74% compared to 0% in Eureka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Eureka at 88% compared to 20% in Grayson.
- In Eureka, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Grayson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grayson at 4% compared to 2% in Eureka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Eureka at 8%, compared to 1% in Grayson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grayson and Eureka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grayson | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 30.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayson vs Eureka
- In Eureka, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 13.3% in Grayson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eureka at 22.8% versus 17.5% in Grayson.
- Eureka has a higher smoking rate at 14.1% compared to 11.3% in Grayson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 15.6% in Grayson.
- Eureka has higher obesity rates at 30.0% compared to 28.5% in Grayson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grayson at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grayson | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (703) | 10.5% (1,337) |
| Less than High School | 6.4% (302) | 3.2% (405) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (1,172) | 30.1% (3,835) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayson vs Eureka
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Grayson and Eureka at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 10.5% in Eureka.
- More residents in Grayson have less than a high school education at 6.4% compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
- In Eureka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 24.7% in Grayson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.