Demographics details for Grayson, GA vs Ephraim, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayson, GA vs Ephraim, WI.
| Data | Grayson | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,753 | 346 |
| Median Age | 31.2 years | 63.9 years |
| Median Income | $121,421 | $72,292 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Grayson vs Ephraim
- In Grayson, the population is higher at 4,753, compared to 346 in Ephraim.
- The median age in Ephraim is higher at 63.9 years, compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421 compared to $72,292 in Ephraim.
- In Ephraim, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 47.0% in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Grayson and Ephraim at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Grayson vs Ephraim provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grayson | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 74 | Data is updating |
| White | 20 | 96 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grayson vs Ephraim
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grayson at 74% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephraim at 96% compared to 20% in Grayson.
- The Asian population is larger in Grayson at 1% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grayson at 4% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephraim at 4%, compared to 1% in Grayson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grayson and Ephraim at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grayson | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 11.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 25.7% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 31.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayson vs Ephraim
- More residents in Grayson report poor mental health at 13.3% compared to 12.5% in Ephraim.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephraim at 21.1% versus 17.5% in Grayson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grayson at 11.3% compared to 11.2% in Ephraim.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ephraim at 25.7% compared to 15.6% in Grayson.
- Ephraim has higher obesity rates at 31.7% compared to 28.5% in Grayson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ephraim at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Grayson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grayson | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (703) | 4.3% (15) |
| Less than High School | 6.4% (302) | 2.3% (8) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (1,172) | 59.5% (206) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayson vs Ephraim
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Grayson and Ephraim at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 4.3% in Ephraim.
- More residents in Grayson have less than a high school education at 6.4% compared to 2.3% in Ephraim.
- In Ephraim, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 59.5% compared to 24.7% in Grayson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.