Demographics details for Grayson, GA vs El centro, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayson, GA vs El centro, CA.
| Data | Grayson | El centro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,753 | 43,811 |
| Median Age | 31.2 years | 32.2 years |
| Median Income | $121,421 | $54,922 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 12.9 |
Population Comparison: Grayson vs El centro
- The population in El centro is higher at 43,811, compared to 4,753 in Grayson.
- The median age in El centro is higher at 32.2 years, compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421 compared to $54,922 in El centro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grayson at 47.0% compared to 33.0% in El centro.
- The poverty level is higher in El centro at 21%, compared to 5% in Grayson.
- El centro has a higher unemployment rate at 12.9% compared to 3.5% in Grayson.
Demographics
Demographics Grayson vs El centro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grayson | El centro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 74 | 4 |
| White | 20 | -16 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 89 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grayson vs El centro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grayson at 74% compared to 4% in El centro.
- Grayson has a higher percentage of White residents at 20% compared to -16% in El centro.
- Both Grayson and El centro have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- El centro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 89%, compared to 4% in Grayson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in El centro at 21%, compared to 1% in Grayson.
- In El centro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Grayson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grayson | El centro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayson vs El centro
- In El centro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 13.3% in Grayson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in El centro at 17.9% versus 17.5% in Grayson.
- El centro has a higher smoking rate at 14.4% compared to 11.3% in Grayson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grayson at 15.6% compared to 14.8% in El centro.
- El centro has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 28.5% in Grayson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in El centro at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Grayson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grayson | El centro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.9% (1,285) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (703) | 12.9% (5,650) |
| Less than High School | 6.4% (302) | 33.3% (14,579) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (1,172) | 9.8% (4,296) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayson vs El centro
- In El centro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.0% in Grayson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 12.9% in El centro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in El centro at 33.3%, compared to 6.4% in Grayson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 9.8% in El centro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.