Demographics details for Grayson, GA vs Cedar grove, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayson, GA vs Cedar grove, NJ.
Data | Grayson | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,753 | 12,549 |
Median Age | 31.2 years | 42.5 years |
Median Income | $121,421 | $107,500 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 68.2% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Grayson vs Cedar grove
- The population in Cedar grove is higher at 12,549, compared to 4,753 in Grayson.
- The median age in Cedar grove is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421 compared to $107,500 in Cedar grove.
- In Cedar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 68.2%, compared to 47.0% in Grayson.
- The poverty level is identical in both Grayson and Cedar grove at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Grayson is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Cedar grove.
Demographics
Demographics Grayson vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grayson | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 74 | 1.2 |
White | 20 | 89.5 |
Asian | 1 | 5.2 |
Hispanic | 4 | 3.1 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 1.0 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grayson vs Cedar grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grayson at 74% compared to 1.2% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 89.5% compared to 20% in Grayson.
- In Cedar grove, the Asian population stands at 5.2%, greater than 1% in Grayson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grayson at 4% compared to 3.1% in Cedar grove.
- Both Grayson and Cedar grove have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grayson and Cedar grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grayson | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 17.5% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 11.3% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 28.5% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayson vs Cedar grove
- More residents in Grayson report poor mental health at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grayson at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grayson at 11.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grayson at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grayson at 28.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grayson at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grayson | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (703) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 6.4% (302) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (1,172) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayson vs Cedar grove
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Grayson and Cedar grove at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- More residents in Grayson have less than a high school education at 6.4% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.