Demographics details for Grayling, MI vs Westminster, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayling, MI vs Westminster, CO.
| Data | Grayling | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,917 | 114,533 |
| Median Age | 48.8 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $30,417 | $90,651 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Grayling vs Westminster
- The population in Westminster is higher at 114,533, compared to 1,917 in Grayling.
- Residents in Grayling have a higher median age of 48.8 years compared to 37.4 years in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $90,651, compared to $30,417 in Grayling.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 26.0% in Grayling.
- Grayling has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 9% in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Grayling.
Demographics
Demographics Grayling vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grayling | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 88 | 58 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grayling vs Westminster
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Grayling and Westminster at 1%.
- Grayling has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 58% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Grayling.
- Westminster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 7% in Grayling.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Westminster at 11%, compared to 3% in Grayling.
- In Westminster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Grayling.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grayling | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 26.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayling vs Westminster
- More residents in Grayling report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.2% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grayling at 26.4% compared to 21.1% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grayling at 19.3% compared to 13.5% in Westminster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Westminster at 21.5% compared to 19.0% in Grayling.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grayling at 37.4% compared to 26.9% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grayling at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grayling | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (13) | 0.9% (1,007) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (332) | 11.9% (13,626) |
| Less than High School | 18.2% (348) | 10.3% (11,853) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (197) | 30.3% (34,676) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayling vs Westminster
- In Westminster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Grayling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayling hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 11.9% in Westminster.
- More residents in Grayling have less than a high school education at 18.2% compared to 10.3% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 10.3% in Grayling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.