Demographics details for Grayling, MI vs Shedd, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayling, MI vs Shedd, OR.
| Data | Grayling | Shedd |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,917 | 168 |
| Median Age | 48.8 years | 24.9 years |
| Median Income | $30,417 | $52,411 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 14.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Grayling vs Shedd
- In Grayling, the population is higher at 1,917, compared to 168 in Shedd.
- Residents in Grayling have a higher median age of 48.8 years compared to 24.9 years in Shedd.
- Shedd has a higher median income of $52,411, compared to $30,417 in Grayling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grayling at 26.0% compared to 14.0% in Shedd.
- Grayling has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Shedd.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Grayling and Shedd at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Grayling vs Shedd provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grayling | Shedd |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 49 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 47 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grayling vs Shedd
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grayling at 1% compared to 0% in Shedd.
- Grayling has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 49% in Shedd.
- The Asian population is larger in Grayling at 1% compared to 0% in Shedd.
- Shedd has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 7% in Grayling.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shedd at 4%, compared to 3% in Grayling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grayling and Shedd at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grayling | Shedd |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 12.8% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayling vs Shedd
- In Shedd, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.0% in Grayling.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shedd at 27.0% versus 26.4% in Grayling.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grayling at 19.3% compared to 17.7% in Shedd.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grayling at 19.0% compared to 17.7% in Shedd.
- Shedd has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 37.4% in Grayling.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shedd at 27.0% compared to 22.0% in Grayling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grayling | Shedd |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (13) | 8.3% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (332) | 22.6% (38) |
| Less than High School | 18.2% (348) | 16.7% (28) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (197) | 7.7% (13) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayling vs Shedd
- In Shedd, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 8.3% compared to 0.7% in Grayling.
- In Shedd, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 17.3% in Grayling.
- More residents in Grayling have less than a high school education at 18.2% compared to 16.7% in Shedd.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayling hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 7.7% in Shedd.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.