Demographics details for Grayling, MI vs Ontario, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayling, MI vs Ontario, CA.
| Data | Grayling | Ontario |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,917 | 184,705 |
| Median Age | 48.8 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $30,417 | $67,659 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 30.5% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Grayling vs Ontario
- The population in Ontario is higher at 184,705, compared to 1,917 in Grayling.
- Residents in Grayling have a higher median age of 48.8 years compared to 34.3 years in Ontario.
- Ontario has a higher median income of $67,659, compared to $30,417 in Grayling.
- In Ontario, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.5%, compared to 26.0% in Grayling.
- Grayling has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 14% in Ontario.
- Ontario has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Grayling.
Demographics
Demographics Grayling vs Ontario provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grayling | Ontario |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 8.5 |
| White | 88 | 36.2 |
| Asian | 1 | 6.0 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 44.5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4.8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 0.5 |
Demographics Comparison: Grayling vs Ontario
- In Ontario, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8.5% compared to 1% in Grayling.
- Grayling has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 36.2% in Ontario.
- In Ontario, the Asian population stands at 6.0%, greater than 1% in Grayling.
- Ontario has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44.5%, compared to 7% in Grayling.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ontario at 4.8%, compared to 3% in Grayling.
- In Ontario, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 0.5%, compared to 0% in Grayling.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grayling | Ontario |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 26.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayling vs Ontario
- More residents in Grayling report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grayling at 26.4% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grayling at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grayling at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grayling at 37.4% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grayling at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grayling | Ontario |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (13) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (332) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 18.2% (348) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (197) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayling vs Ontario
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayling have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayling hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- More residents in Grayling have less than a high school education at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayling hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.