Demographics details for Grayling, MI vs Bellingham, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayling, MI vs Bellingham, WA.
| Data | Grayling | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,917 | 93,896 |
| Median Age | 48.8 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $30,417 | $64,026 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Grayling vs Bellingham
- The population in Bellingham is higher at 93,896, compared to 1,917 in Grayling.
- Residents in Grayling have a higher median age of 48.8 years compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher median income of $64,026, compared to $30,417 in Grayling.
- In Bellingham, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 26.0% in Grayling.
- Grayling has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 11% in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Grayling.
Demographics
Demographics Grayling vs Bellingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grayling | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 88 | 74 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grayling vs Bellingham
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Grayling and Bellingham at 1%.
- Grayling has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 74% in Bellingham.
- In Bellingham, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Grayling.
- Bellingham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 7% in Grayling.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bellingham at 8%, compared to 3% in Grayling.
- In Bellingham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Grayling.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grayling | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 30.0% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 25.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayling vs Bellingham
- More residents in Grayling report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.6% in Bellingham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bellingham at 30.0% versus 26.4% in Grayling.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grayling at 19.3% compared to 14.1% in Bellingham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grayling at 19.0% compared to 17.3% in Bellingham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grayling at 37.4% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grayling at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Bellingham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grayling | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (13) | 0.5% (454) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (332) | 8.8% (8,220) |
| Less than High School | 18.2% (348) | 6.2% (5,781) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (197) | 28.9% (27,095) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayling vs Bellingham
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayling have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayling hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- More residents in Grayling have less than a high school education at 18.2% compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- In Bellingham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 10.3% in Grayling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.