Demographics details for Grayling, MI vs American fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grayling, MI vs American fork, UT.
| Data | Grayling | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,917 | 37,268 |
| Median Age | 48.8 years | 28.0 years |
| Median Income | $30,417 | $90,490 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Grayling vs American fork
- The population in American fork is higher at 37,268, compared to 1,917 in Grayling.
- Residents in Grayling have a higher median age of 48.8 years compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
- American fork has a higher median income of $90,490, compared to $30,417 in Grayling.
- In American fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 26.0% in Grayling.
- Grayling has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 5% in American fork.
- American fork has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Grayling.
Demographics
Demographics Grayling vs American fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grayling | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 84 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grayling vs American fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grayling at 1% compared to 0% in American fork.
- Grayling has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 84% in American fork.
- Both Grayling and American fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- American fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 7% in Grayling.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in American fork at 6%, compared to 3% in Grayling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grayling and American fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grayling | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 6.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 8.5% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grayling vs American fork
- More residents in Grayling report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grayling at 26.4% compared to 23.4% in American fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grayling at 19.3% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grayling at 19.0% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grayling at 37.4% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grayling at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grayling | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (13) | 0.6% (208) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (332) | 7.4% (2,742) |
| Less than High School | 18.2% (348) | 5.7% (2,134) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (197) | 21.3% (7,922) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grayling vs American fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayling have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grayling hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
- More residents in Grayling have less than a high school education at 18.2% compared to 5.7% in American fork.
- In American fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 10.3% in Grayling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.