Demographics details for Gray, ME vs Hackberry, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gray, ME vs Hackberry, LA.
| Data | Gray | Hackberry |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,761 | 988 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 52.2 years |
| Median Income | $81,712 | $98,056 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 64.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Gray vs Hackberry
- In Gray, the population is higher at 7,761, compared to 988 in Hackberry.
- The median age in Hackberry is higher at 52.2 years, compared to 43.0 years in Gray.
- Hackberry has a higher median income of $98,056, compared to $81,712 in Gray.
- In Hackberry, the percentage of married families is higher at 64.0%, compared to 60.0% in Gray.
- The poverty level is higher in Hackberry at 15%, compared to 5% in Gray.
- Hackberry has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.1% in Gray.
Demographics
Demographics Gray vs Hackberry provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gray | Hackberry |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 95 | 100 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gray vs Hackberry
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gray at 1% compared to 0% in Hackberry.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hackberry at 100% compared to 95% in Gray.
- The Asian population is larger in Gray at 1% compared to 0% in Hackberry.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gray at 3% compared to 0% in Hackberry.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gray at 2% compared to 0% in Hackberry.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gray and Hackberry at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gray | Hackberry |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.7% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 29.8% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 19.9% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gray vs Hackberry
- In Hackberry, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Gray.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hackberry at 29.8% versus 0.0% in Gray.
- Hackberry has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Gray.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hackberry at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Gray.
- Hackberry has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 0.0% in Gray.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hackberry at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Gray.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gray | Hackberry |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 21.8% (215) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.6% (134) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.7% (116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gray vs Hackberry
- In Hackberry, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Gray.
- In Hackberry, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in Gray.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hackberry at 13.6%, compared to 0.0% in Gray.
- In Hackberry, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 0.0% in Gray.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.